Last Update: 21/05/2012 13:49

Background
Qualified privilege
Audit process
Frequently asked
questions
Electronic
platform - Fellows interface
Lessons from the audit
Reports and
publications
Seminars
Contact
Background
A clinical audit is particularly relevant to the surgical
specialties. It is accepted as an essential component of the
evidence-based process of performance appraisal. Surgical audit is
a regular, documented, critical analysis of the outcomes of
surgical care. The results are reviewed by peers and used to
further inform surgical practice.
The Northern Territory Audit of Surgical Mortality (NTASM) is an
important initiative of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons
and its Fellowship to peer review the clinical management of deaths
occurring during surgical admission in the Northern Territory.
Funding for this project is provided by the Northern Territory
Department of Health and Families.
The principal aim of NTASM is to improve the quality of
healthcare through feedback and education. In order to achieve
this, evidence from local audit data is required.
Feedback in individual and group formats is produced. Individual
feedback is thus provided to individual surgeons and aggregate data
is disseminated to all surgeons and hospitals.
Surgeons are protected by statutory immunity through
Commonwealth Qualified Privilege legislation. This legislation is
designed to strongly encourage clinical professionals to engage in
quality and safety initiatives in order to bring about improvements
in care.
Summary
The Northern Territory Audit of Surgical Mortality (NTASM) began
in June 2010. It is funded by Northern Territory Department of
Health and Families. Two Northern Territory public hospitals are
currently participating:
- Royal Darwin Hospital
- Alice Springs Hospital
The Northern Territory Department of Health and Families
provides members to a NTASM Management Committee.
The committee reviews de-identified, quantitative reports so it can
further improve and reform health provision in Northern Territory.
It follows methodology established and refined by similar projects
that are concurrently running in Australian
Capital Territory (ACTASM), Queensland
(QASM), South
Australia (SAAPM), Tasmania (TASM),
Victoria (VASM)
and Western Australia
(WAASM). NTASM is administered from the
QASM office. All audits function under the umbrella of the Australian and New Zealand
Audits of Surgical Mortality (ANZASM).
ANZASM, as an audit process, fulfils the following criteria:
- it is independent
- it is external
- it is peer-review
- it is systematic
- it is routine
- it is objective
- it is confidential (all audits are covered by qualified
privilege at a commonwealth level).
Conclusion
Fellows of the College have always had accountability through
personal audits and professional excellence. These qualities have
been included in the College's Continuing Professional Development (CPD)
Program.
However, it is acknowledged that while a high level of
qualitative accountability exists at an individual level, there is
a need from health service providers for quantitative
accountability.
This quantitative accountability and also the qualitative
measures are integral to the needs of those health service
providers. It is also integral to reporting information to the
general public. It is anticipated that statewide reporting and
quality of care can be enhanced through NTASM.
Qualified privilege
Overview
The Qualified Privilege (QP) declaration encourages surgeon
participation within the mortality audits by strictly protecting
the confidentiality of information gained in the audit.
Via a blend of state and commonwealth legislation, the
declaration prevents third parties from using surgical reports for
purposes that could potentially be to the detriment of the surgeon
in question.
The QP declaration allows non-identifiable data to be used in
reviewing and analysing surgical procedures, while information that
may identify an individual requires the expressed approval of the
individual being recognised.
With state and commonwealth authority, the declaration
effectively allows surgeons to confidently participate in the
mortality audits, knowing information they liberally divulge will
be utilised exclusively for its designed professional development
purpose and nothing else.
Details
The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons received approval
from the Minister of Health and Ageing to declare the
Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality (ANZASM)
a "quality assurance" activity under the Commonwealth QP
scheme.
QP declarations are intended to encourage participation of
surgeons by protecting the confidentiality of information created
as part of this activity.
ANZASM is a bi-national framework of regionally based audits of
surgical mortality. Every state in Australia has its own audit.
Although regionally based, all audits are covered by an
over-arching QP protection that
ANZASM has obtained at the national level. In some regions,
state coverage is also held.
This document explains:
- how the national QP legislation imposes responsibilities for
legal disclosure of audit-related information on both the regional
audits and their related audit staff
- what information the regional audit is permitted to disclose to
hospitals (in relation to the Commonwealth QP scheme)
The regional surgical mortality audits are
permitted to:
- provide annual state and hospital reports that contain
aggregated, de-identified (with respect to surgeon and patient)
data that will report on the following:
- audit participation rates for their surgeons (exception:
hospitals with consultant numbers less than two)
- hospital specific rates of optimal or suboptimal care of
patients as compared to state and national averages
- information about the general quality of surgical care being
undertaken at that hospital, relating to all aspects of care during
a surgical admission.
The regional surgical mortality audits are not permitted
to:
- disclose confidential information gained from audit activities
to anyone other than the surgeon involved in the case or the
surgeons specifically assigned to provide a peer review assessment
of the case,
- a person who discloses information stemming from the declared
activity either indirectly or directly to another person or a court
of law faces a possible penalty of up to 2 years imprisonment
(Section 124Y, Health Insurance Act 1973).
Important, to provide audit information to:
- chief executive officers, or
- surgical/medical/clinical directors,
at hospitals where the surgeon is practicing is not permitted by
law.
However, the Federal Minister of Health may authorise disclosure
of information that relates to a serious offence against a
law-in-force in any State or Territory. This means:
- identifying information can only be disclosed with the express
approval of the identified individuals.
- the release of any such information would be unusual and should
only occur after the implications of disclosure are properly
considered.
Participating surgeons in the audit are permitted to identify
other practitioners involved in the case.
Please note,
ANZASM in partnership with Russell Kennedy lawyers compiled the
QP guide. For further information about the QP scheme contact
ANZASM.
Audit
process
NTASM is a peer-review process. Participation by consultant
surgeons is a requirement of the College's Continuing Professional
Development (CPD) Program.
To start: NTASM is notified by the hospital of all
surgically-related deaths (before, during or after surgery)
Next: NTASM sends a Surgical Case Form (PDF 346 KB) to the
consultant surgeon linked to the case. This may be sent by post or
by email if the surgeon is using the Fellows interface.
The Surgical Case Form is:
- completed by the consultant surgeon or a registrar (under
supervision)
- returned to NTASM in the reply paid envelope (as soon as
possible) or electronically using the Fellows interface
- de-identified and sent to a first-line assessor (a consultant
surgeon: same speciality, different hospital) for anonymous
peer-review.
If a second-line assessment (case note review) is not requested
by the first-line assessor, the original surgeon will be sent
written feedback to this effect (and the case will be
closed).
If a second-line assessment (case note review) is requested by the
first-line assessor (that is, the case needs further investigation
or insufficient information has been provided on the Surgical Case
Form) then these steps are followed:
- a second-line assessor is chosen by NTASM's Clinical
Director
- medical records are requested
- the second-line assessor then reviews the Surgical Case Form,
the medical records and the first-line assessor's comment, before
writing a one or two-page report. Note: The review is carried out
and the report written in a spirit of sympathetic enquiry,
providing sufficient details for a clear view of events
- the report and relevant feedback is sent to the original
surgeon. The case is then closed
- at each stage of the process the original surgeon has right of
reply.
Frequently asked
questions
Do I have to participate in NTASM?
Participation in an audit of surgical mortality is a requirement of
the College's CPD
Program under Category One: Surgical Audit and Peer Review.
If I participate do I have to be a first or second-line
assessor?
You can choose to be a first-line assessor, and/or a second-line
assessor. You can participate in the NTASM without being a
first-line assessor, and/or a second-line assessor.
Are any instructions/guidelines provided for first and/or
second-line assessors?
Guidelines are printed on the first-line and second-line assessment
forms sent to you. An example of a second-line assessment report
(1-2 page) is also sent to you.
Is the NTASM process confidential?
All data and forms are de-identified. All data and forms are
securely stored. NTASM reports are covered by qualified
privilege.
How will NTASM know if a patient has died under my care?
NTASM is notified (regularly) of surgically related deaths that
occur in 4 Northern Territory public hospitals. Notification occurs
through the hospitals' medical records departments or the mortality
and morbidity meetings of the hospital.
What if I need the medical records to fill out the NTASM
Surgical Case Form?
Contact the medical records department of your hospital to ensure
records can be located and delivered to you.
What do I do after completing the NTASM Surgical Case
Form?
Please return the Surgical Case Form to QASM in the reply paid
envelope provided or electronically using the Fellows interface. Contact us if you have any
questions or concerns.
Who do I contact if I have any queries?
Please contact the NTASM Project
Manager.
Electronic
platform - Fellows interface
ANZASM now offers an electronic submissions platform called Fellows interface. If you do not have a
username and password email
the NTASM office. The paper-based submission format is still
current and available. When submitting information to the
audit office, ensure that the study ID and patient UR number are
clearly labelled on all the supporting documentation.
Lessons from the audit
Read the issues of Lessons from the audit (members
only)
Reports and publications
Annual reports
Annual Report 2010-2011 (PDF 1.07 MB)
Publications
Teleconference fracture clinics: a trial for rural
hospitals by J North (PDF 934 KB)
Manual
Fellows interface quick start guide (PDF 717
KB)
Forms
Surgical case form (PDF 368 KB)
Consultant participation form
(PDF 180 KB)
Links
American Journal
of Public Health
American Journal of
Surgery
Annals of
Surgery
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
ANZ
Journal of Surgery
Anaesthesia
Archives of Surgery
Australian Prescriber
British Journal of Surgery
British Medical Journal
(BMJ)
Canadian
Journal of Surgery
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular
Surgery
European Journal of
Vascular Surgery
Healthcare Quarterly
Intensive Care
Medicine
International
Journal of Public Health
International Journal of
Surgery
Journal of the
American Medical Association (JAMA)
Journal of
Telemedicine and Telecare
Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular
Surgery
Journal of
Trauma
Medical Journal of
Australia
New England
Journal of Medicine
Rural and Remote Health
Telemedicine Journal of
EHealth
General links
Science
Direct - access to Journal of Vascular Surgery
American
Medical Association (AMA) - access to other journals
Wiley
Highwire Press
Sage
Publications
Seminars
3 August 2012, in conjunction with QASM, NTASM will be
co-hosting a seminar for registered nurses, midwives and
paramedics. The theme is "Distance, Delays,
Deteriorating Patients." Download the flyer (PDF 171 KB) and the program (PDF 111 KB) which gives details
of venue, times, registration. To register please email qasmseminar@surgeons.org or
phone 07 3835 8671.
Contact
All general enquiries can be directed to:
NTASM - Royal Australasian College of Surgeons
PO Box 79
Spring Hill QLD 4004 Australia
Email: ntasm@surgeons.org
Telephone: +61 7 3835 8671
Fax: +61 7 3236 9320
Clinical Director - Dr John North
Project Manager - Therese Rey-Conde
Project Officer - Jenny Allen
Administrative Officer - Kyrsty Webb
Darwin Contact - Gayle Eccles